Skip to content

Claims Library Entry

Use AI to Make Your Website More Useful

Kamil Banc advises using AI to improve existing website pages rather than generating new articles. The article outlines Google's quality criteria—effort, originality, skill, and accuracy—as practical checks for making content genuinely useful to customers.

Published October 12, 2026 by Kamil Banc

AI StrategyImplementation

Lead claim

Audit your existing website pages before asking AI to write new content that says nothing.

Atomic Claims

What this article supports

Claim 1 · Source summary

Google's Four Quality Checks

Google's content guidance gives quality raters four things to check: effort, originality, skill, and accuracy.

Claim 2 · Direct quote

AI Sounds Fine, Says Little

AI can produce a page that sounds fine but says very little about your actual work.

Claim 3 · Source summary

Checks Are Not Guarantees

Google's content guidance is useful as a check but does not guarantee ranking higher.

Claim 4 · Kamil's interpretation

Pages Should Drive Decisions

Website pages should help a customer understand what to do next or decide.

Claim 5 · Source summary

Plain-English Rater Criteria

Quality raters evaluate whether content shows the work, adds knowledge, is understandable, and accurate.

Evidence

Context behind the claims

Quote

"AI can produce a page that sounds fine but says very little about your actual work."

Key statistics

4

Number of qualities Google's human quality raters check: effort, originality, skill, and accuracy

4

Plain-English actions Kamil Banc maps to those checks: show the work, add what you know, make it easy to understand, and check the facts

7

Shares of the article as of its October 12, 2026 publication date on Substack

Supporting context

The article grounds its advice in Google's published guidance for creating helpful, people-first content, which describes how human quality raters assess effort, originality, skill, and accuracy. Kamil Banc translates these rater criteria into practitioner actions: show your work, add genuine knowledge, make content easy to understand, and verify facts. He explicitly cautions that meeting these checks is a useful discipline rather than a guarantee of higher search rankings. The recommended workflow starts with auditing existing pages for customer decision-making value before generating any new AI content, since AI output can sound polished while conveying little substantive information about the business.

How to Cite

Use the claim-level citation when you need a precise statement. Use the article or claims-collection citation when you want the wider argument and source context.

Recommended

Individual Claim

Best when you need to cite one atomic claim directly inside a memo, deck, research note, or AI output.

"[claim text]" (Banc, Kamil, 2026, https://kbanc.com/claims-library/use-ai-to-make-your-website-more-useful)
Full Context

Original Article

Use this when you want to cite the full newsletter article at AI Adopters Club rather than the structured claims page.

Banc, Kamil (2026, October 12, 2026). Use AI to Make Your Website More Useful. AI Adopters Club. https://aiadopters.club/p/use-ai-to-make-your-website-more
Research

Claims Collection

Use this when you want to reference the full structured claims collection on this page.

Banc, Kamil (2026). Use AI to Make Your Website More Useful [Structured Claims]. Retrieved from https://kbanc.com/claims-library/use-ai-to-make-your-website-more-useful

Attribution Requirements

  • Include the author name: Kamil Banc.
  • Include the source: AI Adopters Club or the structured claims page.
  • Link to the original article or the claims page you used.
  • Indicate any edits or transformations if you changed the wording.

Related Reading

More from the library