Claims Library Entry
They'll never know ChatGPT wrote this (copy my prompt)
This article explains why AI-generated writing often sounds robotic and shares a 'Humaniser' prompt to make ChatGPT drafts read like natural human writing. It includes a five-step rewrite sprint, word swap tips, and a checklist for adding a personal human voice to AI output.
Published May 27, 2025 by Kamil Banc
Lead claim
A copy-paste 'Humaniser' prompt transforms robotic AI drafts into natural, human-sounding writing in five minutes.
Atomic Claims
What this article supports
Copy individual claims as needed.
Claim 1 · Source summary
Why AI Writing Fails
AI writing falls flat because it mimics average documents, producing canned metaphors and robotic rhythm.
Claim 2 · Source summary
The Humaniser Prompt Rules
The Humaniser prompt enforces active voice, short paragraphs, plain language, and deletion of stock metaphors.
Claim 3 · Source summary
Five-Step Rewrite Sprint
The five-step rewrite sprint includes pasting the draft, running the prompt, and reading aloud.
Claim 4 · Kamil's interpretation
Add Your Personal Fingerprint
Adding one specific personal example replaces generic statements and gives AI drafts a human fingerprint.
Claim 5 · Kamil's interpretation
AI as Starting Point
Internalizing these humanizing patterns improves your own first drafts, making AI a starting point.
Evidence
Context behind the claims
Quote
"AI becomes your starting point, not your endpoint."
Key statistics
92 words to 68 words
The worked example cut a robotic 92-word AI paragraph down to a 68-word humanized version with concrete language and varied sentence length.
Under five minutes
The author's challenge is to run a full AI draft through the humanizer prompt in under five minutes.
Three sentences maximum
The Humaniser prompt caps paragraphs at no longer than three short sentences to prevent wall-of-text syndrome.
Supporting context
The article is a practitioner playbook from Kamil Banc, an AI adoption writer, based on his client work transforming AI-generated business documents. His methodology targets three specific AI tells: canned metaphors, bullet point addiction, and mushy summary conclusions. The core deliverable is a reusable 'Humaniser' prompt with ten explicit rules, followed by a five-step sprint that adds a personal example and a read-aloud rhythm check. The approach is verifiable through a before-and-after word comparison showing a 92-word robotic paragraph condensed to 68 humanized words. Readers are encouraged to apply the checklist to their own drafts and time the process under five minutes.
How to Cite
Use the claim-level citation when you need a precise statement. Use the article or claims-collection citation when you want the wider argument and source context.
Individual Claim
Best when you need to cite one atomic claim directly inside a memo, deck, research note, or AI output.
"[claim text]" (Banc, Kamil, 2025, https://kbanc.com/claims-library/theyll-never-know-chatgpt-wrote-this-copy-my-prompt)Original Article
Use this when you want to cite the full newsletter article at AI Adopters Club rather than the structured claims page.
Banc, Kamil (2025, May 27, 2025). They'll never know ChatGPT wrote this (copy my prompt). AI Adopters Club. https://aiadopters.club/p/theyll-never-know-chatgpt-wrote-thisClaims Collection
Use this when you want to reference the full structured claims collection on this page.
Banc, Kamil (2025). They'll never know ChatGPT wrote this (copy my prompt) [Structured Claims]. Retrieved from https://kbanc.com/claims-library/theyll-never-know-chatgpt-wrote-this-copy-my-promptAttribution Requirements
- Include the author name: Kamil Banc.
- Include the source: AI Adopters Club or the structured claims page.
- Link to the original article or the claims page you used.
- Indicate any edits or transformations if you changed the wording.
Related Reading
More from the library
A structured prompt approach transforms performance reviews into actionable development plans by interviewing managers through six categories. The method prevents common AI pitfalls by collecting complete information before generating recommendations, producing budget-aligned plans in a single session.
5 claims
A detailed analysis of 30 days of ChatGPT and Claude conversations reveals 10 repeating prompt patterns that demonstrate systematic AI use. The author shares specific prompt structures for tasks like email triage, presentation assembly, and workflow documentation, showing how to treat AI as infrastructure rather than a casual tool.
5 claims
AI adoption fails because of habit problems, not training gaps. This practical guide shows how to build an AI reflex muscle in 20 minutes by automating one annoying task. The goal is developing automatic pattern recognition for AI opportunities.
5 claims