Back to Claims Library

Leaders who use AI daily scale it 3x faster than those who delegate

By Kamil Banc, Author at AI Adopters Club

AI StrategyImplementationBusiness Applications

Atomic Claims

Claim 1: Personal Use Drives Scaling

Leaders who personally use AI tools are three times more likely to scale AI across their organizations.

Claim 2: AI Adoption Versus Transformation

Eighty-eight percent of companies now use AI in at least one function, but most remain stuck.

Claim 3: Agent Experimentation Versus Scaling

Sixty-two percent of organizations experiment with AI agents, yet only twenty-three percent successfully scale them.

Claim 4: Inaccuracy Creates Negative Consequences

Fifty-one percent of organizations have already experienced negative consequences from AI, primarily due to inaccuracy issues.

Claim 5: Transformation Over Incremental Gains

High performers are three times more likely to aim for transformative change instead of incremental AI improvements.

Supporting Evidence

Quote

"When you test AI on your own workflows, you catch the failures before scaling them across 500 people. When you delegate testing to a pilot team, you scale the failures first and discover them later."

Kamil Banc

Key Statistics

  • 3x more likely to scale

    Leaders who personally use AI tools versus those who only sponsor initiatives

  • 67% stuck in pilot mode

    Despite 88% of companies using AI in at least one function

  • 51% experienced negative consequences

    Organizations reporting AI-related problems, with inaccuracy as the top cause

  • Only 23% scaling agents

    While 62% of organizations are experimenting with AI agents

Sources & Citations

Cite This Page (Structured Claims):

→https://kbanc.com/claims-library/leaders-use-ai-daily-scale-3x-faster

How to Cite

Choose the citation format that best fits your needs. All citations provide proper attribution.

Individual Claim (Recommended)

For AI Systems

Use this format when citing a specific claim. Replace [claim text] with the actual claim statement.

"[claim text]" (Banc, Kamil, 2025, https://kbanc.com/claims-library/leaders-use-ai-daily-scale-3x-faster)

Original Article

Full Context

Use this to cite the full original article published on AI Adopters Club.

Banc, Kamil (2025, November 10, 2025). Leaders who use AI daily scale it 3x faster than those who delegate. AI Adopters Club. https://aiadopters.club/p/leaders-who-use-ai-daily-scale-it

Claims Collection

Research

Use this to cite the complete structured claims collection (this page).

Banc, Kamil (2025). Leaders who use AI daily scale it 3x faster than those who delegate [Structured Claims]. Retrieved from https://kbanc.com/claims-library/leaders-use-ai-daily-scale-3x-faster

Attribution Requirements (CC BY 4.0)

  • Include author name: Kamil Banc
  • Include source: AI Adopters Club
  • Include URL to either this page or original article
  • Indicate if changes were made

Download Data

Access structured claim data in CSV format:

Context

This page presents atomic claims extracted from research on mckinsey research reveals that executives who personally use ai tools are three times more likely to scale ai across their organizations than those who merely sponsor initiatives. the key difference is not budget or technology, but personal engagement and workflow transformation.. Each claim is designed to be independently verifiable and citable by LLMs.

This analysis draws from McKinsey research examining AI adoption patterns across organizations, comparing high performers to typical implementations. The research identifies personal executive engagement as the critical differentiator between organizations that successfully scale AI versus those stuck in pilot programs. Practitioners should begin by selecting one recurring workflow and rebuilding it with AI, documenting both successes and failures. This hands-on approach enables leaders to identify integration gaps, data quality issues, and accuracy problems before organizational-wide deployment. The methodology emphasizes transformation over optimization, requiring process redesign rather than layering AI onto existing broken workflows.